Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 1, 2017 2:00:27 GMT -5
MI, OF, SD
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 1, 2017 2:47:37 GMT -5
Accidentally posted, won last week...is he available or not?
|
|
|
|
Post by Brewers GM (Larry) on Jun 1, 2017 5:25:31 GMT -5
No, But we need to have a deadline for players to be picked up on Fantrax
|
|
|
|
Post by Angels GM (Jason) on Jun 1, 2017 7:13:28 GMT -5
No, But we need to have a deadline for players to be picked up on Fantrax Same as Chavis. Adding players on Fantrax Over the years we've constantly had issues with franchises failing to pick up a player on the league scoring site one, two, even four weeks after officially acquiring the player. If you acquire a player and you don't place him on your Fantrax roster within 72 hours after the transaction has been approved or confirmed, the player becomes a free agent again. At this point, an authorized league official or volunteer will notify the league of the player who has recently become a free agent and list them under the area titled "FA Waivers". |
|
|
|
Post by Brewers GM (Larry) on Jun 1, 2017 7:19:30 GMT -5
Thanks Jason  |
|
|
|
Post by Giants GM (Ron) on Jun 1, 2017 7:23:25 GMT -5
No, But we need to have a deadline for players to be picked up on Fantrax Same as Chavis. Adding players on Fantrax Over the years we've constantly had issues with franchises failing to pick up a player on the league scoring site one, two, even four weeks after officially acquiring the player. If you acquire a player and you don't place him on your Fantrax roster within 72 hours after the transaction has been approved or confirmed, the player becomes a free agent again. At this point, an authorized league official or volunteer will notify the league of the player who has recently become a free agent and list them under the area titled "FA Waivers". There should be a penalty for this. This has been a problem for years as you have indicated. I am not saying this is the case here but a team could easily do this to stop others from getting these players at a potentially cheaper price. Once the "market price" is known that basically becomes sets the floor pricewise. These players were "won" by a very good team. These transactions would put them slightly over the cap limit. I know they could easily fix this within 72 hours but whomever had the 2nd highest bid gets the shaft. He can always bid again but the market price is more defined and will likely cost them more now. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 1, 2017 7:45:09 GMT -5
so are these guys free agents or do we give them to them next highest bidder? Even if that's not the case for these guys we should have a rule for that in the future.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brewers GM (Larry) on Jun 1, 2017 8:34:08 GMT -5
I feel they should be offered to the next highest bidder Teams should also be responsible for half of contract |
|
|
|
Post by Angels GM (Jason) on Jun 1, 2017 8:48:46 GMT -5
I feel they should be offered to the next highest bidder Teams should also be responsible for half of contract In the past it was next highest bid but who knows now |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 1, 2017 9:01:43 GMT -5
I feel they should be offered to the next highest bidder Teams should also be responsible for half of contract Agreed. |
|
|
|
Post by Giants GM (Ron) on Jun 1, 2017 12:03:30 GMT -5
I feel they should be offered to the next highest bidder Teams should also be responsible for half of contract DING! DING! DING! I agree. |
|
|
|
Post by Angels GM (Jason) on Jun 1, 2017 12:25:02 GMT -5
I feel they should be offered to the next highest bidder Teams should also be responsible for half of contract DING! DING! DING! I agree. I thought this was already the rule |
|
