|
|
Post by Giants GM (Ron) on Jan 6, 2017 7:40:57 GMT -5
Have two FT, 2 RT (one traded away)
Evan Longoria 2017: 13M, 2018: 13.5M, 2019: 14.5M, 2020: 15M, 2021: $18.5M, 2022: $19.5M, 2023: $13M c/o (RT)
Addison Reed 3rd yr Arb eligible est $6M (FT)
Yasiel Puig 2017: $8,214,000, 2018: $9,214,000 (FT)
Bryan Shaw 2017: 3rd year arb eligible est $3.5M drop
Carlos Ruiz 2017: $4.5M drop
Mark Lowe drop
These are what I probably do. Please weigh in so we can process these decisions before the start of FA on Monday.
Does this look better? Swapping RT and FT tags between Longo and Puig?
|
|
|
|
Post by Brewers GM (Larry) on Jan 6, 2017 9:00:00 GMT -5
Ok with everything but Franchising Longoria. He's on a downward trend. way to much to spend on him IMO
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 6, 2017 9:02:26 GMT -5
Ok with everything but Franchising Longoria. He's on a downward trend. way to much to spend on him IMO I agree with Larry, maybe FT puig and rt longo |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 6, 2017 10:01:14 GMT -5
Please don't franchise Longoria. Agree with Anton's plan. Make Puig's FT a prospect tag.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 6, 2017 10:16:24 GMT -5
Puig can't be prospect tagged, I'm pretty sure he was signed to an MLB deal
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 6, 2017 17:11:36 GMT -5
Puig can't be prospect tagged, I'm pretty sure he was signed to an MLB deal I was being lazy and assumed.  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 6, 2017 18:48:19 GMT -5
Only reason I know is bc I signed him
|
|
|
|
Post by Giants GM (Ron) on Jan 6, 2017 22:13:20 GMT -5
a
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 14, 2017 19:06:38 GMT -5
We need to make some choices on some of these rfa Longo, Phelps and fister (who didn't get a bid)
|
|
|
|
Post by Brewers GM (Larry) on Jan 14, 2017 20:06:44 GMT -5
Doug Fister - SP - SEA (via TRP) - NO BIDS - Give $400K for how many years ?
NYY have high bid - David Phelps - 3 yrs, $15M, AAS $5M - SEA (via TRP) - I say decline to match and receive 3rd round pick (NYY) and a Sandwich pick after 3rd and 4th
LAA have high bid - Evan Longoria - 6 yrs, $102M, AAS $17M - OAK (via TRP) - I say decline to match and receive 1st round pick (LAA) and a Sandwich pick between the 1st and 2nd
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 15, 2017 12:41:24 GMT -5
Fister: At $0.4M, you can go two years and not lose much. However, he doesn't have much more in the tank. No more than two years.
Phelps: He's at his peak. He's not going to get better, and if anything, I see him regressing a bit. Agree: Decline to match!
Longoria: No brainer: Decline to match!
|
|
|
|
Post by Giants GM (Ron) on Jan 15, 2017 13:58:07 GMT -5
Fister: At $0.4M, you can go two years and not lose much. However, he doesn't have much more in the tank. No more than two years. Phelps: He's at his peak. He's not going to get better, and if anything, I see him regressing a bit. Agree: Decline to match! Longoria: No brainer: Decline to match! Agree on all. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 15, 2017 16:18:40 GMT -5
Agree as well
|
|
|
|
Post by Brewers GM (Larry) on Jan 16, 2017 6:20:58 GMT -5
Guys, I feel the Rays should get the Angels 1st pick & supplemental for signing Grienke. A's are an open team and should get the 2 supplemental picks after the 1st round from Angels for signing Longoria.
|
|
|
|
Post by Giants GM (Ron) on Jan 16, 2017 7:13:44 GMT -5
I might agree with you but he hasn't been on since Dec 7th. A couple of others have not declared their intention to match or not. I assume the teams with the winning bids get the players?
|
|
|
|
Post by Brewers GM (Larry) on Jan 16, 2017 7:15:12 GMT -5
I'm assuming the winners get the players since deadline has past
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2017 8:25:01 GMT -5
Maybe next year we do a 72 hour matching period. It would be tough not to give players to the teams that follow the rules. I'm all for giving some slack here and there but they should be here. I'd give the angles pick to the A's but whatever you guy think is best is fine for me at the end of the day
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2017 8:28:42 GMT -5
We also may need to keep an eye out for new owners for both the rays and the royals if they don't become more active again
|
|
|
|
Post by Brewers GM (Larry) on Jan 16, 2017 8:33:31 GMT -5
Yes we should increase the time to 72 hours. For now though we need to stick to the rules. Stanton & Grienke most likely wouldn't have been matched
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2017 11:02:12 GMT -5
"If the franchise that restricted the player fails to respond or chooses not to match the best contract offer made to their player, then the auctioned player will be required to sign with the franchise that made the winning bid. That franchise must use the exact winning contract offered and cannot restructure it after the fact."
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2017 11:03:09 GMT -5
I can understand how the 48-hours we decided on is a bit short, but there's only so much babysitting we can do.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brewers GM (Larry) on Jan 16, 2017 11:20:23 GMT -5
So AL RFA is complete right? teams not responding lose player. Who are we giving LAA 1st pick to OAK or TB ?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2017 22:47:18 GMT -5
So AL RFA is complete right? teams not responding lose player. Who are we giving LAA 1st pick to OAK or TB ? Teams not responding lose player. As for the first-rounder: "If a franchise gives up multiple same round picks as compensation (for example, the Reds win two separate RFA players at AAS $10M, suggesting the loss of two 2nd-round picks), the first franchise that declined to match will receive the winning franchise's pick, and subsequent franchises will receive two compensatory sandwich picks in the same round." A's get first dibs, then Rays get seconds for not responding. |
|
