Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 17, 2015 9:28:39 GMT -5
February 9: Unrestricted Free Agency begins
SP: Feb 9- Feb 13
OF/C: Feb 16-Feb 20
MI/CI: Feb 23-Feb 27
RP: March 2- March 6
March 9: Minor League Free Agency
Pitchers- March 9-March 13
Position Players - March 16-20
I think we need to combine one of these sections and start free agency next week.
How about:
February 23: Unrestricted Free Agency begins
SP/RP: Feb 23-Feb 27 This week will suck, but takes away SP/RP confusion. Or we could go SP ---- OF / RP ---- MI/CI/C
OF/C: March 2- March 6
MI/CI: March 9-March 13
March 9: Minor League Free Agency
Pitchers- March 16-March 20
Position Players - March 23 - March 27
Normal free agency March 30
This gives one week of normal free agency before the season starts which I am a fan of.
|
|
|
|
Post by Giants GM (Ron) on Feb 17, 2015 12:25:55 GMT -5
Works for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brewers GM (Larry) on Feb 17, 2015 12:28:24 GMT -5
Looks good
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2015 16:24:13 GMT -5
I don't think we need to separate the SP and RP.
|
|
|
|
Post by Angels GM (Jason) on Feb 20, 2015 17:41:56 GMT -5
I don't think we need to separate the SP and RP. Agree |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2015 15:36:29 GMT -5
Can someone make an announcement that free agency starts tomorrow
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2015 15:39:04 GMT -5
You don't you do it
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2015 15:45:42 GMT -5
I'm on my phone right now...if nothing is up in like an hour when I get back to my room I'll take care of it
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2015 21:10:05 GMT -5
So wait...is there a reason why we have SP/RP and then in late march we have exclusive pitchers again? Also shouldn't unowned prospects have its own week?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2015 21:35:46 GMT -5
Minors/Majors separated
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2015 21:40:49 GMT -5
So where it says March 9th minor league free agency...is that just a typo?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2015 21:45:54 GMT -5
Since I'm updating the rule set and offseason free agency is set to begin, I'd like to clarify the rules. Currently:
"Each week thereafter, a field position (i.e. OF, CI, MI, C, SP or RP) will be open for bidding. You will only be allowed to bid on players who played that position each week....i.e. only OF may be bid upon during a week designated for OFs. Bids on a player not at that position will be invalidated."
I would like to make it clearer than "players who played that position each week." Do we want to say as long a position player played one game at a position they can be bid on? 10 games? I simply want it to be clear what makes an outfielder eligible for outfielder free agency.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2015 21:49:54 GMT -5
Yes shoudl be 16th
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2015 12:25:54 GMT -5
Since I'm updating the rule set and offseason free agency is set to begin, I'd like to clarify the rules. Currently: "Each week thereafter, a field position (i.e. OF, CI, MI, C, SP or RP) will be open for bidding. You will only be allowed to bid on players who played that position each week....i.e. only OF may be bid upon during a week designated for OFs. Bids on a player not at that position will be invalidated." I would like to make it clearer than "players who played that position each week." Do we want to say as long a position player played one game at a position they can be bid on? 10 games? I simply want it to be clear what makes an outfielder eligible for outfielder free agency. Well how about with Tomas? Are we going to allow him to be bid on with the CIs because of where the Dbacks are going to play him? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2015 12:26:55 GMT -5
By the way...I'll take care of the bid sorting for the first few weeks...I'll let you know if I need any help later on
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2015 13:29:09 GMT -5
When In doubt go by fantrax. They have him as CI.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2015 17:11:22 GMT -5
Fair enough. Thanks for the clarification.
|
|
|
|
Post by Angels GM (Jason) on Mar 1, 2015 10:16:08 GMT -5
Since I'm updating the rule set and offseason free agency is set to begin, I'd like to clarify the rules. Currently: "Each week thereafter, a field position (i.e. OF, CI, MI, C, SP or RP) will be open for bidding. You will only be allowed to bid on players who played that position each week....i.e. only OF may be bid upon during a week designated for OFs. Bids on a player not at that position will be invalidated." I would like to make it clearer than "players who played that position each week." Do we want to say as long a position player played one game at a position they can be bid on? 10 games? I simply want it to be clear what makes an outfielder eligible for outfielder free agency. Well how about with Tomas? Are we going to allow him to be bid on with the CIs because of where the Dbacks are going to play him? Are we including Tomas as an of? What I've read is Tomas will start in the of with lamb at 3b. If I remember correctly fantrax is one of a handful that has Tomas as a ci. We as admin on fantrax can over ride position availability. Just a thought I don't care either way. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 1, 2015 13:28:26 GMT -5
I say we just say CI...I don't think it's really that big of a deal
|
|
