Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 22, 2015 20:35:56 GMT -5
Someone proposed the idea to me of raising the prospect tag from 3M and 5M to 4M and 8M. I think this is a reasonable adjustment based on the growing real life contracts and how much of a value the prospect tag is.
What say you?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 22, 2015 21:39:56 GMT -5
I'd be okay with 4 and 6.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 22, 2015 21:44:32 GMT -5
I kind of like it the way it is but if you guys want to change it I don't really mind either
|
|
|
|
Post by Giants GM (Ron) on Jan 22, 2015 21:50:30 GMT -5
I agree with Seth. Our caps have risen so should the prospect tag amount.
|
|
|
|
Post by Angels GM (Jason) on Jan 23, 2015 8:28:46 GMT -5
I personally like it the way it is. If we do change it I like 4 '6. I think 8 for prospect is a bit steep.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2015 11:54:00 GMT -5
I'm fine with four and six.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2015 13:36:32 GMT -5
I do agree that I'd personally prefer to keep it as is.
Can we vote between the TRP on keep it as is or change it to 4 and 6?
I'm for keep it at 3 and 5
|
|
|
|
Post by Angels GM (Jason) on Jan 23, 2015 13:45:04 GMT -5
Keep it as is
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2015 13:56:37 GMT -5
As is for me
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2015 14:00:11 GMT -5
Keep as is.
|
|
|
|
Post by Giants GM (Ron) on Jan 23, 2015 15:53:39 GMT -5
Keep as is works for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brewers GM (Larry) on Jan 24, 2015 2:29:30 GMT -5
keep as is please
|
|
