Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 18, 2013 16:04:17 GMT -5
He accepted are trade for Sean Marshall, The salary was posted clearly. He now rejects it. That is not allowed.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 18, 2013 16:14:07 GMT -5
Yea...if he accepted the trade he can't just pull out. I've talked to this Cardinals guy a few times and told him to read up on the rules because he doesn't seem to understand any of the league language.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 18, 2013 16:17:37 GMT -5
He accepted the trade. I posted he wrote accept. I had contract written accurate. He then revised. Someone better inform him because he is saying a league moderator told him its not correct.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 18, 2013 17:12:00 GMT -5
Once a trade is agreed apon there is not pull out after. I say to keep it as is. Plus Marshall's contract info was posted sonindont know how he could have missed it
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2013 10:32:27 GMT -5
*facepalm* Yeah, I get the rules can be a bit overwhelming for someone new, but I also get the feeling this new GM is really struggling with them, more than necessary. If he agreed, then it's his unless there was a significant error in what was presented.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2013 10:35:45 GMT -5
*facepalm* Yeah, I get the rules can be a bit overwhelming for someone new, but I also get the feeling this new GM is really struggling with them, more than necessary. If he agreed, then it's his unless there was a significant error in what was presented. He's trying to make the league more complicated than it actually is lol. Can someone send him a PM explaining why he can't back out? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2013 14:21:48 GMT -5
100 bucks Matthew told Cardinals he could back out of our trade.
I think A LO member should ask the cardinals who told him he was allowed to backout
|
|
|
|
Post by Brewers GM (Larry) on Feb 19, 2013 14:39:55 GMT -5
I think we should remove him from the league. He doesn't understand. All trades by him should be on hold until he gets it if he's going to stay. Matthew is praying on all the new guys. If possible Matthew too.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2013 21:10:01 GMT -5
alright he is gone. Dude is crazy
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2013 21:13:18 GMT -5
Are all his trades voided?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2013 22:11:18 GMT -5
alright he is gone. Dude is crazy What happened?...did you talk to him through PMs? lol |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2013 22:40:23 GMT -5
Yeah the guy is all over the place. I think he has serious memory problems. Then started saying all kinds of crazy stuff and was like if this is gonna stand then I am done because he tried to cheat me. The contract was never changed. Strange.
What do yall think? Should they be voided?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2013 22:40:38 GMT -5
I mean that contract really makes no sense for the cardinals
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2013 23:13:42 GMT -5
I never changed the contract haha, I have another deal in place for Marshall if it gets voided. I want Matthews voided as well because i believe he is the one who started talking to cardinals about backing out of the trade.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2013 23:19:01 GMT -5
Yea I think he sent me a PM about memory loss as well. Lets just kick him out and void his trades.
WHAT THE HELL IS UP WITH FINDING AN OWNER FOR THE CARDINALS!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Angels GM (Jason) on Feb 20, 2013 0:43:38 GMT -5
I have talked to Wayne numerous times in reference to the rules/draft/FA. In these conversations he did tell me he had a serious head injury and suffers from amnesia and short-term memory loss, as a result of the injury.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2013 9:53:06 GMT -5
He needs to be booted and his other trade voided as well. This is just start with this guy.
|
|
|
|
Post by Angels GM (Jason) on Feb 20, 2013 14:03:52 GMT -5
Now that he is gone, are we voiding Matthew's deal with him or do we honor it? I have to head to work, so if you want to make an announcement either way.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2013 14:13:29 GMT -5
I'd say void, I don't think it would be fair to ax Nicks trade and not this one. The Cards have a weak roster and I don't think this trade betters them long term but if you think other wise then keep it. We should just do what's best for the cards
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2013 14:17:15 GMT -5
Void. If the next cardinals owner wants that deal then he can make it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rangers GM (Jared) on Feb 20, 2013 14:41:22 GMT -5
Yea I say void.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2013 14:49:31 GMT -5
I agree, void it and start from scratch. It sucks, because you don't want to appear too heavy-handed, but you have to do what's in the best interest for the now ownerless team.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2013 15:41:43 GMT -5
Yup...void all transactions
|
|
|
|
Post by Angels GM (Jason) on Feb 20, 2013 22:15:18 GMT -5
Posted Cards trades are voided.
|
|
