|
Post by Angels GM (Jason) on Feb 14, 2013 20:14:24 GMT -5
Twins send: Bubba Starling (prospect) Ryan Dempster, SP-Boston 13:$9M
Blue Jays send: Prospects Dan Jennings, L.J. Hoes, Nick Delmonico, John Stilson 4th round FYPD 13-14
I have been asked to post this trade by several owners. The reason is Starling is far to valuable to a team like the Twins than anyone in this trade. Lets hear what others have to say.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2013 20:24:19 GMT -5
Bubba is rated in the 50's overall as a prospect now. Sickels gave him a B and Delmonico is a B- and Stilson/Hoes are C+/B-. I win the trade In my opinion but i dont think it can vetoed but im in the trade so I have no Vote
Matthew offered far less for Bubba to the Twins I have the pm he sent me thinking I was Twins. Brandon is Matthews friend. I dont see how outside owners can bring up Veto votes . This ia 2 trades of mine in a row "owners" have complained
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2013 20:57:48 GMT -5
2 relievers, a 4th outfielder, and a CI that can't hit...
Grades don't translate to fantasy value. These are types you can pick up in free agency easily.
Bubba is HIGH risk. But we are talking about a potential fantasy stud. Then add a solid pitcher on a reasonable contract... This is pretty bad. This makes a bad team significantly worse.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2013 21:31:14 GMT -5
Delmonico is a good prospect 11 homers with 400 abs at 19 in A ball. Same age as Bubba btw. Bubba has a way bigger upside obviously but saying Delmonico cant hit isnt correct.
Anyone couldve acquired Dempster for nothing he was trying to clear the cap.
|
|
|
Post by Angels GM (Jason) on Feb 15, 2013 8:55:38 GMT -5
I have thought long and hard about this trade and I will have to veto it. I just think giving up Starling in a deal like this, could set the Twins back a few years and they are already void of talent.
On another note, if any owner comes to me with concern over a trade and would like to put it to a vote, I will do so, out off transparency, it adds credibility, and it is the right thing to do; Regardless of who asks for a review.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 15, 2013 10:23:09 GMT -5
Yea I'm sorry Nick...I think this is a classic case of an owner taking quantity over quality. Veto.
|
|
|
Post by Brewers GM (Larry) on Feb 15, 2013 10:30:48 GMT -5
I'm sorry too Nick, This trade is basically Demptser & Starling for Delmonico. I have to veto also.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 15, 2013 12:49:33 GMT -5
I told Chip are deal was going to be Vetoed and he sent me this new offer
Matzek Delmonico Stilson Hoes Dan Jennings 2 and 4 in FYPD
for Marshall and Bubba.
Marshall at 10 million for 2 years he cant give away and I would be instantely trying to give away. And Matzek and a 2nd are added.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 15, 2013 13:07:07 GMT -5
I told Chip are deal was going to be Vetoed and he sent me this new offer Matzek Delmonico Stilson Hoes 2 and 4 in FYPD for Marshall and Bubba. Marshall at 10 million for 2 years he cant give away and I would be instantely trying to give away. And Matzek and a 2nd are added. its a pass for me on this trade
|
|
|
Post by Angels GM (Jason) on Feb 15, 2013 13:46:38 GMT -5
still not a big fan of the return for the Twins on the revised version, but not worthy of a veto, I will pass
|
|
|
Post by Angels GM (Jason) on Feb 15, 2013 13:47:24 GMT -5
2-0 pass, on the revised trade.
|
|
|
Post by Rangers GM (Jared) on Feb 15, 2013 16:53:13 GMT -5
I will pass the new deal.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 15, 2013 18:41:12 GMT -5
Yah pass.
|
|