Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 27, 2012 7:44:14 GMT -5
I think we should have some kind of rule about how many time two team can post a trade that keeps getting vetoed. If this gets vetoed again and the just add another irrelevant prospect and post this is going to get annoying. I'd say 3 times but just a suggestion
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 27, 2012 18:19:14 GMT -5
Can we kick this guy out. Making terrible trades one after the other decimating his team fast
|
|
|
|
Post by Angels GM (Jason) on Nov 27, 2012 19:38:48 GMT -5
Can we kick this guy out. Making terrible trades one after the other decimating his team fast I hate kicking people out and would like to believe in the learning curve, but if that is what is best for the league, I will back that decision. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 27, 2012 20:52:00 GMT -5
The guy does seem clueless...too bad...he's really active
|
|
|
|
Post by Brewers GM (Larry) on Nov 28, 2012 2:58:45 GMT -5
Can we kick this guy out. Making terrible trades one after the other decimating his team fast I also think it's time to give him the boot. What do we do with the trades he already made? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 28, 2012 7:48:10 GMT -5
If we reverse the trades we're going to have a lot of unhappy people. I don't mind if he stays or goes but if we kept him I just don't want to how to continue vetoing this Strasberg trade bc I'm sure the A's will add another mid level guy and repost. I think most of the damage has been done already. The sox started to fall apart with the last GM and I think we should have done something then. Now is it better to keep an eye on someone who is a bit clueless or have another empty team. I also think we Need to step up with the teams who have no GM. We should help teams like the braves and twins who haven't had a real person running them in a long time. I think we should have some people run two team until there replaced. Also we will never find a GM for the mets bc that team is a hot mess.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 28, 2012 14:34:41 GMT -5
I did bring up the idea of running inactive teams until we could find a new owner 2 years back...I'm fine with that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 28, 2012 14:56:21 GMT -5
I will run one of the teams until a owner is found
|
|
|
|
Post by Rangers GM (Jared) on Nov 29, 2012 19:06:08 GMT -5
Veto the deal. We can't take back all trades I think. Will piss off too many people. We can remove him if that's what we think is best.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 29, 2012 20:02:21 GMT -5
I am also for removing him
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 4, 2012 15:24:58 GMT -5
So is he staying for going? If he is its better to do it now then wait for another bad trade
|
|
